Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS); Quantitative analysis; Matrix effect; Self-absorption;INDUCED PLASMA SPECTROSCOPY; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; LEAST-SQUARES REGRESSION; ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; EMISSION-SPECTROSCOPY; SPECTRAL-LINE; SOIL SAMPLES; IRON-ORE; CHEMCAM INSTRUMENT

This paper reviews methods to compensate for matrix effects and self-absorption during quantitative analysis of compositions of solids measured using LaserInduced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) and their applications to in-situ analysis. Methods to reduce matrix and self-absorption effects on calibration curves are first introduced. The conditions where calibration curves are applicable to quantification of compositions of solid samples and their limitations are discussed. While calibration-free LIBS (CF-LIBS), which corrects matrix effects theoretically based on the Boltzmann distribution law and Saha equation, has been applied in a number of studies, requirements need to be satisfied for the calculation of chemical compositions to be valid. Also, peaks of all elements contained in the target need to be detected, which is a bottleneck for in-situ analysis of unknown materials. Multivariate analysis techniques are gaining momentum in LIBS analysis. Among the available techniques, principal component regression (PCR) analysis and partial least squares (PLS) regression analysis, which can extract related information to compositions from all spectral data, are widely established methods and have been applied to various fields including in-situ applications in air and for planetary explorations. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), where non-linear effects can be modelled, have also been investigated as a quantitative method and their applications are introduced. The ability to make quantitative estimates based on LIBS signals is seen as a key element for the technique to gain wider acceptance as an analytical method, especially in in-situ applications. In order to accelerate this process, it is recommended that the accuracy should be described using common figures of merit which express the overall normalised accuracy, such as the normalised root mean square errors (NRMSEs), when comparing the accuracy obtained from different setups and analytical methods. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.